Tightness–looseness: A new framework to understand consumer behavior

نویسندگان

  • Ren Li
  • Sarah Gordon
  • Michele J. Gelfand
  • Jae Moon
چکیده

In February of 2011, U.S. electronics and entertainment retailer Best Buy closed all nine of its branded stores in China after only five years in the market. Although analysts had believed that China held promise for large growth opportunities, Best Buy ultimately captured less than 1% of the market and struggled to compete against local rival companies Gome and Suning, each of which had more than 1000 branded stores in the country (Waldmeir, Strauss, & Birchall, 2011). According to research conducted by China Market Research Group, a strategic market intelligence firm based in Shanghai, Best Buy's failure ultimately resulted from a lack of understanding of Chinese consumer norms for smaller, conveniently located stores (Rein, 2011). Similarly, a Financial Times article explained that the company's store strategy of dividing up items by category rather than leading brands was “at odds with local habits” (Waldmeir et al., 2011). Failures of this magnitude illustrate the critical need for cross-cultural research in consumer behavior (CB). Once primarily a Western enterprise, the field has begun to go global (Maheswaran & Shavitt, 2000; Torelli & Rodas, 2016). In just the last two decades, CB research has examined how culture influences brand loyalty (Kim, Forsythe, Gu, & Jae Moon, 2002; Lam, 2007; Luo, Zhang, & Liu, 2015; Ogba & Tan, 2009; Palumbo & Herbig, 2000; Subramaniam, Al Mamun, Permarupan, & Zainol, 2014; Yoo, 2009), brand extensions (Buil, de Chernatony, & Hem, 2009; Grønhaug, Hem, & Lines, 2002; Han & Schmitt, 1997; Monga & John, 2007; Ng, 2010;

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Refining the tightness and looseness framework with a consumer lens

In their paper, Li, Gordon and Gelfand (this issue) introduced the Tightness–Looseness (T–L) framework to the consumer domain, and offered several ideas on how this framework could be applied to consumer behavior. In this commentary, we examine the T–L framework through the consumer lens and discuss how the uniqueness of the consumption context can refine and broaden this psychological framewor...

متن کامل

The role of culture–gene coevolution in morality judgment: examining the interplay between tightness–looseness and allelic variation of the serotonin transporter gene

This research provides novel insights into the evolutionary basis of cultural norm development and maintenance. We yield evidence for a unique culture-gene coevolutionary model between ecological threat, allelic frequency of the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR), cultural tightness-looseness-the strength of norms and tolerance for deviance from norms-and moral justifiability. As hyp...

متن کامل

On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness.

Cross-cultural research is dominated by the use of values despite their mixed empirical support and their limited theoretical scope. This article expands the dominant paradigm in cross-cultural research by developing a theory of cultural tightness-looseness (the strength of social norms and the degree of sanctioning within societies) and by advancing a multilevel research agenda for future rese...

متن کامل

Across-Time Change and Variation in Cultural Tightness-Looseness

Cultural tightness-looseness, a dimension which describes the strength, multitude, and clarity of social norms in a culture, has proved significant in explaining differences between cultures. Although several studies have compared different cultures on this domain, this study is the first that targets both within-country differences and across-time variation in tightness-looseness. Using data f...

متن کامل

Comparing American State Resident Neuroticism and State Tightness-Looseness as Predictors of Annual State Residential Mobility.

State resident neuroticism and the Harrington and Gelfand state tightness-looseness dimension were compared as predictors of state levels of residential mobility from 2004 to 2005 in the 50 American states. Hierarchical multiple regression controlled for state SES, white population percent, urban population percent, home ownership percent, and percent of home owners or renters paying 30 percent...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017